Skip to content

March 17, 2011


baez in a bombshell future transcript!

by Andrea O'Connell

I was able to get my hands on more of the future testimony of the Defense Expert Witness, Dr. Wacklo Pits.

In his redirect with Dr. Pits, Attorney Baez makes the important point that his defense team will only hire experts who will lie tell the defense’s version of the truth on the stand.

The problem with this testimony?  Mr. Baez seems to loose track of what message he wants to convey to the jury.  He seems quite confused, but then he finds a better stride right at the end.

This transcript is straight from the future, and based on this testimony, you will realize things are looking quite good for the State of Florida!

The redirect of Dr. Wacklo Pits

Judge:  Mr. Baez?  Redirect?

Baez:    (no response)

Judge:  (louder) MR. BAEZ?!

Baez:    Shoot, ah, um, sorry Judge, yes, I’m ready.

Judge: Proceed

Baez:   Dr. Pits.  You have worked a number of high profile cases, have you not?

Pits:     Yes, indeed I have.

Baez:  You have testified as an Expert defense witness in trials that resulted in a defendant being found guilty, have you not?

Pits:    Well…. yes.

Baez:  So, it is fair to say, is it not, that you will testify for the guilty or the innocent, because you want to find the truth, correct?

Pits:    I don’t understand your question.

Baez:  What I mean is this: even though, hypothetically, Casey is guilty, you would still testify for the defense, is that correct?

Pits:    I still don’t understand your question.

Baez:  Let me simplify.  It is your opinion that there were no hands involved in the death of Caylee Anthony, which is why we know Casey is innocent, correct?

Pits:  Okay?

Baez:  So, let’s say, hypothetically, your opinion is Casey is guilty, and Caylee died by Casey’s hands.  You would still testify even if Casey was guilty, that’s how honest you are?

Pits:   Well….

Baez: Is it fair to say, Dr. Pits, that you would also testify for the State, even if you knew the client was innocent?

Pits: (Looks at Judge, concerned)  Ah….

Baez: Likewise, you would testify truthfully for the Defense even when you know the defendant is guilty?

Pits: Again, I’m not sure I understand ….

Baez: I want you to look at the jury and explain to them that it doesn’t matter that Casey is guilty, you are still going to tell the truth, correct?

Judge: Mr. Baez!

Baez: Judge?

Judge: Listen to yourself, please.

Baez: I will; thank you, your Honor.

Baez: Now. Dr. Pist, please tell the jury that even though a defendant is guilty, you will still tell the truth.

Pits: Pist is not my name. (Looking at jury – who have their collective heads down.) Mr. Baez is correct. The Guilt or innocence of a defendant only matters depending on which side pays me.

Baez: Thank you, Dr. Pits. That leads me to my next question. Your name is Dr. Wacklo Pits, is that correct?

Pits: Yes.

Baez: Is your name Dr. Tips?

Pits: No.

Baez: Peps?

Pits: No!

Baez: Spits?

Pits: NO!

Baez: Stips?

Pits: No!!

Baez: Step?

Pits: NOO!

Baez: Pepper?

Pits: No! Though I do like Dr. Pepper….

Baez: Oh, me too. I will only drink the diet kind with cherry.

Pits: I don’t like diet.

State: OBJECTION!  Relevance!

Judge: Overruled

Baez: You can answer, Dr. Pepper.

Pits: I would only work for the Defense if the client was guilty.


Judge: You can’t object to your own witness.

Baez: Oh yes I can!


Baez: You can’t object, Judge!

Judge: Oh yes I can!  Answer the question Dr. Pepper!

Pits: I don’t like diet Dr. Pepper and even though Casey is guilty as hell, I will testify with candor and truth.

Baez:  You’re a good man, Doctor…. Doctor…

Judge: Pepper.

Pits:  Dear God.

13 Comments Post a comment
  1. Mar 17 2011

    is he still pist?

    straight from the future – heehehe

    • Mar 17 2011

      LOL! He is more Dr. Pepper in this line of questioning….but, he sure is pist, too! 🙂

  2. Diana
    Mar 18 2011

    I just love it when you cross out words. LOL
    Thanks for the morning laugh!! ~Diana

  3. jon
    Mar 18 2011

    very good Andrea.

  4. Mar 18 2011

    Yup, money sure has a way of talking doesn’t it? Money is no respecter of persons for sure!

  5. Mar 18 2011

    You are funny, Andrea! LOL!

  6. CptKD
    Mar 18 2011

    Hey Andrea –
    So you and your readers know…
    Express has posted that the rulings are in!
    Perry says statements coming in!

    Wanted to let you know –
    Will find some links for you and bring them back ok…

    Back soon….


    • Mar 18 2011

      WOW!! Thanks a bunch! Thats great news! Can hardly wait to read the rulings!

      Sent from my iPhone

      • CptKD
        Mar 18 2011

        You are more than welcome!
        Lots of reading ahead –
        I just read one of the the Orders and it was 15 pages long –
        Lots of info there…

        My home pc is down, as it picked up “something” on one of the blogs, and it has sent it into a nasty tailspin of viruses, trojans, worms… the works!
        I got fed up with using my phone, it’s too hard and limiting, and so I reached for the laptop –

        Usually a “no-no”, as it is my WORK BIBLE, but I couldn’t hold out any longer…LOL!

        Hopefully get the house pc back up and running right this wknd, or else it will have to be the laptop way next wk. We got three days of court sessions coming up, and I cannot miss those…

        So anyways, I will try and catch up with you later – CptKD

  7. CptKD
    Mar 18 2011
    • Mar 18 2011

      Yup! It worked! Thankin’ ya!

  8. CptKD
    Mar 18 2011

    Ok –
    Not so much reading afterall…
    It winds up just being the four motions, and the others were pretty short reading – 2 pages -type of thing.

    Anyways, I’ll leave it at that for now, and wait to see what you have to say about it all at the end of the day….LOL!

    I look forward to reading your take on things – CptKD

    • Mar 18 2011

      I just got home and read the rulings. They are very, very bad for the Defense case. The way the Judge wrote these rulings it’s almost as if he’s laying her grave…. And the defense made mistakes in the case law they cited OMG! How embarrassing! Going to take my time and read them now, then will post…


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: