the court jesters
Today, in the State of Florida v. Casey Anthony, the day began with a discussion regarding whether the six felony charges against Casey, can be proffered by the State. There will be more discussion on this as the trial wears on. The State could mention the felonies since Baez opened the door to allow it in, but rather than risk a possible issue on appeal, the State is backing off of using it, at this time.
Amy Huizenga was the first to take the stand this morning. It was Baez’ turn to cross examine Amy. She clearly got irritated at Baez’ habit of putting absurd words in her mouth, as he often does to witnesses, but Amy was quick and did not allow Baez to twist her words.
Baez actually suggested that Amy went after Casey’s boyfriends when Casey was done with them! He was referring to Ricardo Morales (she slept on his couch). And, because Amy and Jesse Grund met a couple of times to discuss the case, Amy must have been involved with him, says Baez. It was totally inappropriate. I wish Amy had said, “Yeah, I also tried to use my bank account after Casey was done with it, we know how that turned out!”
Then, Baez suggested that Amy was a big drinker. He intimated that in 2008, when Amy fell asleep at the wheel and crashed into a guard rail, she was drunk. Amy said, “that’s not relevant.” And it wasn’t!
Lee Anthony was on the stand today. He testified about Casey’s admission about being “a spiteful bitch,” with regards to keeping Caylee away from the family. Lee said, Cindy Anthony suggested Casey was an “unfit mother.” Amy Huizenga referred to this as well.
With regards to Lee’s testimony. Was there even a whisper about the molestation allegation against Lee? Nope! Nary a word spoken by the State of Florida, therefore the Defense could not bring it up.
I thought it was the elephant in the room for the jury. The Defense will have to bring it up in their case, if they are allowed. I believe there will have to be evidence to support it before the Defense can raise it.
There were quite a few Orange County Sheriff’s Officers who took the stand today today. Brendan Fletcher was the first of Officer on the scene on Hopespring Drive on July 15th, and he was the first to take the stand today. He testified that he had not smelled an odor emanating from the car, and left the home after two hours.
Then, Adriana Avecedo, the Officer who took Casey in her squad car to Sawgrass Apartments.
Finally, Reginald Hosey took the stand and was asked about how Casey was handcuffed, and did he order the handcuffs removed? He didn’t remember.
The defense tried with all their might to revisit the Miranda issue once again. Cheney Mason did everything in his power to discuss how threatening the police are – how threatened Casey must have been is the idea he wanted to float.
Mason discussed the (intimidating) cage (bars) used in police cars; he talked about the scary men in scary police uniforms and scary guns on their belt. Oh, and there were so many officers there, too. His argument fell flat; and the record is clear on this issue – Judge Perry has ordered that all of Casey’s statements were admissible some time ago.
Yuri Melich was on the stand today, and as usual, he was an excellent, intelligent and professional witness.
Casey Anthony’s written statement from July 15th was brought into evidence and read into the record by Yuri. Then, the first recorded interview that Yuri took of Casey was entered into evidence and played for the jury.
Casey lied, and lied, and lied some more in that statement. And, worse than that, Casey’s vocal tone, pitch and slow pace was reminiscent of a job interview, not a plea to find a daughter recently kidnapped.
From the defense today, I began to hear their innuendos about George Anthony, all of which suggest that George was distant about the “kidnapping” because he knew Caylee was already gone.
Here are examples of what I heard:
- George did not react when Cindy fell into his arms after telling him Caylee was missing.
- One by one police officers were asked what was George like that night, July 15? Invariably, the witnesses today said, George was calm, while Cindy was frantic. I believe it was Officer Hosey who said, Cindy was at times frantic and at times calm.
- When Lee was questioned in cross, he was asked if George came into the bedroom to talk to Casey. No, he didn’t, Lee said.
- The conclusion seemed to be that George was oddly distant given the situation.
The defense will take every opportunity to twist George’s actions into suspicious innuendo against him. The facts remains, however, this defense team will not be able to create reasonable doubt – they are too incompetent to spin such a tale. There are too many holes in the story Jose Baez told in his bizarre opening statement – proof that they have not given enough thought to theory.
Had the defense done a simple IF / THEN examination of their theory, they might have more answers, instead of black holes that make no sense.
- IF George was involved in a “drowning accident” of Caylee, THEN why would he not perform CPR or call 911? What compelled George to hide Caylee’s body?
- IF George got Casey involved in covering the death up, THEN why did the Cadaver Dogs alert on two places in the yard and why did the body decompose in the trunk?
- IF George and Casey were in cahoots to hide the body, THEN why would George, a former detective, not advise Casey about the harm of leaving evidence behind?
- IF George has something to do with the “accident” and colluding with Casey, THEN why would he report the gas can incident to the police?
- IF George and Casey were in on the murder, THEN why would she tell her mother about the gas can incident, rather than hide it from her?
- IF Casey was sexually abused, THEN why did she trust George to take care of her daughter? Note: I read that it has never (or rarely) been reported that a sexually abused mother would kill her offspring.
- IF there had been a pool accident, THEN why did both George and Casey have NO reaction to the pool accident that was discussed by Cindy in the Jail video?
We could go on and on with IF / THEN scenarios that prove the lies Baez floated in his opening have glaring holes, and are so obscenely foolish.
We laugh so often at Jose Baez and his inane tactics that he’s become our Court Jester.
He’s missing the large ruffled collar, the diamond colored leggings, the large shoes that curl at the point with bells on the heels. Well, that’s no matter. He’s still recognizable.