Drama was in full swing today when Jose Baez, during his over-the-top argument to the jury, suddenly screams, pointing to Assistant State Attorney, Jeff Ashton, and says “…that laughing guy!”
And, well, Ashton was smirking, there’s no doubt about it. Regardless, it completely infuriated Judge Perry when he heard Baez shout, “that laughing guy.”
“SUSTAINED,” Judge Perry screamed at the same time Jeff Ashton bellowed, “OBJECTION!”
Judge Perry immediately sent the jurors out, while the attorneys went into chambers. Then, the next thing we knew, the Judge, in his shirt and tie, is seen stomping in the courtroom hallway flanked by three uniformed police officers. Everyone thought contempt charges were imminent. The thought of Jeff Ashton being charged with contempt was horrifying; a nail-biting time. Thankfully, Judge Perry softened, giving the attorney’s another chance to maintain decorum as the Judge had previously ordered they do.
It is unclear to me whether Mr. Baez was going to face contempt as well. It seemed obvious that the real infraction had to do with Jeff Ashton’s facial expressions – he’d tried to hide a smile by putting his hand over his mouth, making Baez livid. Frankly, I can’t blame him. Jose’s antics were maddening and laughable at the same time. Nonetheless, Ashton was wrong to react as he did.
I was shocked not only that this serious situation was playing out in the courtroom, but also at what Jose Baez did to help the situation. Mr. Baez, magnanimously, asked Judge Perry to not hold Mr. Ashton in contempt. He then apologized for getting caught up in the moment. After both attorneys apologized the proceedings continued as usual.
The dramatic day began with a brilliant and cohesive closing argument by Jeff Ashton. The State’s opening lasted only 77 minutes. Baez and Cheney Mason (who literally put me to sleep), used the full four hours given to them to argue their case.
Jeff Ashton methodically laid out the lies Casey told. Ashton noted Casey Anthony’s ability to keep her lies together was a result of her intelligence. She’s a smart girl, he told the jurors, she seamlessly moves from lie to lie to lie. “Her lies are impressive,” Mr. Ashton, added, with a good dose of cynicism.
I began to take notes as I listened to Ashton, but abandoned them because his argument became incredibly compelling and I didn’t want to miss a word!
Mr. Ashton pointed out that Casey needed to do away with Caylee because she was beginning to talk and could inadvertently blow Casey’s cover. If George or Cindy had asked Caylee about Zanny, it would be all over for Casey. Therefore, argued Mr. Ashton, Casey needed to “get rid” of this problem.
Ashton described how the three pieces of Henkel duct tape were applied to Caylee, and were proof of premeditation. The first piece of tape covered her mouth, the next piece covered her nose, and the third piece placed over the two previous pieces to ensure the air was blocked.
And, like so many of us hope and pray, Ashton said, “One can only hope that that chloroform was used beforehand (before the tape was applied).”
In a very poignant moment Mr. Ashton pointed out the terrible irony that the tape used to kill Caylee, was also used by George Anthony to implore people to find her – to hang the missing Caylee posters.
The Baez Closing
Jose Baez began his argument rather weakly, then built up steam, only to climax in the middle of his argument into a screaming meme! Baez kept this loud, angry, screaming tone that had to get old fast for the jurors. How would you feel if someone is less than three feet in front of you and screaming their head off for three and a half hours?
Baez’s arguments were sustained in excess of ten times during his argument. Though many talking heads were praising Jose’s work. Even my favorite attorney, Bill Shaeffer, gave Baez a B-plus.
Granted, Baez made some good points, but he never got any “ah-ha” moments, in my estimation. I felt his arguments fell flat with a loud bang. And, Baez was really sarcastic and used the word “slut” in relation to Casey Anthony three or four times. He called her a liar, too. Childish, in my view.
In his argument, Baez heaped much of the blame on George Anthony, of course. Roy Kronk was a target, still, too. Baez called the State’s evidence “a fantasy.”
It was painful to listen to Jose Baez today as he twisted facts and massaged testimony to benefit the defense. It’s very aggravating to write about Baez’s closing – it was so annoying I nearly turned it off. And then, Cheney Mason got up to speak and he lulled me right to sleep so I missed the majority of his closing.
Baez had quite a number of visual aids. The visuals were nicely done and expensive looking. Baez had the pictures of the witnesses on magnets and then shifted them into groups on a poster board, aligning and moving the photos according to the story he wanted to spin as he trashed the State’s case.
The jurors were tired; Judge Perry, sensitive to their needs, saw that they were and the day concluded for them at 6:30 pm.
The lawyers and Judge Perry had not agreed on the Jury Instructions, they worked through lunch and into the evening to finalize both the jury instructions and the charging document for the jury to use. They recessed at approximately 8:00 tonight.
Tomorrow, the State of Florida will finish their closing arguments beginning at 8:30 am. Linda Drane-Burdick will begin for the State. I hope Jeff Ashton has an opportunity to argue again, too. I hope that Frank George is given an opportunity to argue as well.
Today was pretty amazing, and tomorrow will seal the deal for the State.
They will state their case beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt for this jury.
No doubt here!
So, we learned today the mystery surrounding Saturday’s sudden court recess in the State v. Casey Anthony trial.
Casey Anthony’s team of defense attorneys determined that, lo and behold, after three years of hearings and one month of trial proceedings, Casey Anthony was not competent to stand trial.
And we thought it was the defense team who were the incompetent ones!
Why all of a sudden is Casey Anthony not competent? No one saw this one coming!
I agree with Bill Shaeffer, my favorite Orlando Attorney, who said it could be that Casey is asking to testify in her own defense, and the lawyers are advising her not to. The defense undoubtedly knows it would be a disaster if she were to take the stand, is this the reason she’s suddenly incompetent?
Three independent psychologists examined Casey Anthony this weekend. Their reports were submitted to Judge Perry who found that Casey is indeed competent to stand trial.
As I wrote yesterday, the defense is damned if they do and damned if they don’t ask Casey to testify. She is the only person who can bring the molestation claims against her brother and her father into the trial; and she is also the only one who will be able to testify to the drowning claims.
It’s likely that the defense, in particular Cheney Mason who filed the motion to determine competence, wants a CYA (cover-yer-arse), type of record. They likely want to be certain that appellate courts will see that the defense would not recommend she take the stand.
Or, perhaps it’s the other way around? Does the defense want her to take the stand and she refuses, hence she’s crazy?!
Just like this weekend’s speculation – this is my best guess today (Bill Shaeffer agrees, so I’m in good company!)
The Issue of the Death Penalty
Attorney Ann Finnell was in court today. The jury hadn’t seen her since their voir dire in Clearwater.
She has a smooth style, and her succinct questioning of witnesses is excellent. It was nice to see a competent attorney on the defense side of the aisle.
Ann Finnell also made some news today as she recently filed a motion asking the court to declare the Florida Statute on the death penalty unconstitutional.
This motion is filed on the heels of a recent decision by a federal judge in Miami.
On June 22, 2011, Judge Jose Martinez, ruled that Florida’s sentencing of the death penalty is unconstitutional.
The reason? Because currently juries take into account particular aggravating factors in their decisions regarding the death penalty, but jurors do not record which factor they weighed above others – which factors they may have agreed upon (if there are multiple factors), and which they did not agree upon. Therefore, no one is made aware of the details of their decisions.
The recent ruling also finds troubling the fact that in death penalty trials, the decision to vote for the death penalty does not have to be unanimous.
At this time, during sentencing, only the Judge has to provide opinions surrounding the aggravating factors.
The view of people in the legal community say this ruling will not end the death penalty in Florida, but it WILL be argued anew as a result of this recent decision.
According to the Miami Herald, reporter David Ovalle writes:
The ruling, likely to be argued in appellate courts for years, does not strike down Florida’s capital-punishment law. But it could force lawmakers to change the statute, and could give recent convicts new avenues for appeal, legal experts say.
Read the Miami Herald article.
Currently, Florida courts allow jurors to make death penalty recommendations that are not unanimous decisions.
A twelve panel jury only requires a majority vote. It also does not require jurors to record which aggravating factor encouraged their individual decisions. Therefore, it is unknown if all jurors in the majority would have agreed unanimously on specific aggravators.
In addition, trial judges, such as Judge Belvin Perry, have the authority to override the decision of the jurors, whether they decide for or against the death penalty. In other words, if the jury decides the defendant should be sentenced to death, the trial judge can sentence life. Conversely, if the jurors decide life in prison is their recommendation, the judge can overrule them and sentence the defendant to death.
Furthermore, the argument used in Judge Martinez’ ruling, explains that if both the jurors and the trial judge vote for death for the defendant, there is no way to know which aggravating or mitigating factors were relied on by either the judge or the jury.
Judge Martinez determined the death penalty unconstitutional because of these very facts. The case in which his decisions were decided is the case of a defendant named Paul H. Evans. Evans was convicted and sentenced to death in 1991, for his actions in a murder-for-hire case.
An Assistant Public Defender in Miami, discussing the death penalty, remarked that it was ironic that it takes a majority vote to send a defendant to jail for life, but only a majority of jurors to sentence a defendant to death.
Today, Ann E. Finnell, attorney representing Casey Anthony, filed a motion stating that the decision by Federal Judge Martinez, makes the death penalty in the Casey Anthony case unconstitutional. She also wants a new trial with a new jury. It is highly doubtful the Judge will decide in favor of this motion. I have every reason to believe that Judge Perry has already thought long and hard about the implications of this recent decision as it relates to the Anthony trial.
Regardless, I do hope the death penalty aspect of this motion prevails.
I’ve just finished watching most of today’s testimony in the State of Florida v. Casey Anthony trial, in Orlando. Today’s testimony did not disappoint, and it continues to go down hill for Casey Anthony and her hapless defense team.
First on the witness stand today, the State called another Cadaver dog handler. Just as Jason Forgey’s dog, Gerus did, Bones, the K9 handled by Sergeant Kristin Brewer, also alerted to decomposition in the backyard of the Anthony home. It was eerie that both dogs alerted to the same spot in the back yard.
It was the saddest testimony! Just the thought that Casey actually considered burying her dear daughter there in the backyard is gruesome – unspeakably cruel. I wonder what the jury is thinking about this? Their hearts have to be breaking.
The State is laying out its case in such a way that it should be effortless for the jury to connect the dots, don’t you think?
In my opinion, the dots will draw a picture of premeditation, especially after hearing what the computer specialists had to say today.
What does the jury think about Casey sitting at the defense table as if she’s in another world? I get the feeling that Casey Anthony is watching this trial unfold like its happening to someone else – like she’s watching a movie, or something.
Search for Chloroform 84 Times!
First let me say that Linda Drane Burdick is brilliant! It was fascinating to see how she planned the witnesses to each compliment each other – each computer expert built upon the next.
The final computer analyst, John Dennis Bradley, consulted for the State Attorney on the case, and his was the testimony most damaging.
There were Google and Wikipedia searches on Casey Anthony’s computer for:
- Internal bleeding,
- Ruptured spleen,
- Chest trauma,
- Household weapons,
- Hand to hand combat,
- Neck Breaking,
- Internal Bleeding, and
- How to make Chloroform.
All of this is bad enough, and Baez did his best to try to diminish the blows – in reality he didn’t come close because Linda Drane Burdick, during her redirect, asked Mr. Bradley the BOMBSHELL question:
Linda Drane Burdick: How many times was the word “chloroform” searched on this computer?
Mr. Bradley: 84 times.
Linda Drane Burdick: No more questions, your Honor.
Judge Perry: Cross examination on these items and these items alone, Mr. Baez?
Jose Baez: No further questions, your Honor.
What could Baez say? He was utterly defeated after Ms. Drane-Burdick kicked it out of the ball park!
Casey Anthony began these horrible key-word searches in March of 2008. In my estimation, this is a clear indication of premeditation – she plotted and planned the murder of Caylee!
If the State can provide more evidence of premeditation, how will Casey Anthony avoid the death penalty? This is one of the most important factors, I believe.
Did Casey Anthony Really Want to Kill her Parents?
Remember when Amy Huizenga was (so she thought) just days away from moving into the Anthony home?
Ever since the beginning of this case, when the Law Enforcement interviews with Amy Huizenga were released, I thought that Casey Anthony was actually plotting to kill her parents, not Caylee.
Some of the key word searches, like hand-to-hand combat, self defense, chest trauma, etc., lead me to think this. And, when Casey told the story of her father having a stroke, her parents getting a divorce, her mother moving out of the house, leaving no-job-Casey to pay the mortgage, it occurred to me she was setting up some kind of scenario with her parents as victims.
As a result of reading the story on today’s WFTV coverage of the trial, I feel even more convinced of this possibility.
In today’s WFTV article, click here for link, they suggest the following:
The experts testified that Casey’s first chloroform search was done on March 17, 2008 around the time she found out she couldn’t go to Puerto Rico with friends because her mother Cindy Anthony would not watch Caylee for her.
The state is setting the stage for premeditated murder by showing she was searching chloroform some three months before Caylee disappeared, said WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer.
The computer searches all happened in the month of March!
It is difficult to wrap my brain around Casey Anthony planning to murder her daughter (or her parents) since March, 2008!!
That was a bombshell for me.
Note: A blogger, Sandy, left a note today asking why would Jose Baez say “since Caylee went ‘missing” in reference to something on the computer? Isn’t it the defense’s contention that Caylee was drowned? Why would he say this today? I guess he doesn’t believe his own theory either.
Before denying a motion on behalf of half a dozen media outlets, the Honorable Judge Belvin Perry, presiding over the State of Florida v. Casey Anthony, advised Media attorney Judith Mercier that the right to a fair trial, by a jury of one’s peers, is the most fundamental of all our freedoms as Americans.
He told Ms. Mercier that he has already robbed Casey Anthony of one of her freedoms: The right to a jury of her peers in the county where the crime occurred, and he refused to deny her the most fundamental of her rights: A fair trial.
The dilemma with this case, unlike other cases, the media and the public interest is unprecedented, Judge Perry observed. Judge Perry advised the attorneys and Casey Anthony, he believes this case could potentially outdo the popularity of the O.J. Simpson trial.
Judith Mercier, rabidly and persistently argued the absolute provision of a free press and the peoples right to know. Her argument, in my view, did not attempt to balance the rights of a defendant to a fair trial. Instead she argued that Voir Dire should take care of the question of bias in a juror.
“Have you ever tried a capital case, Ma’am, “ asked Judge Perry. “No,” answered Ms. Mercier.
“Have you ever picked a jury in a Capital Case, Ma’am,” asked Judge Perry. In answer, Ms. Mercier told Judge Perry, “No.”
There was no empathy or concern from this attorney for the Sixth Amendment Rights of Casey Anthony.
Ms. Mercier maintained in her argument that the harm to the right of the people to know (the location of the jury selection process), trumped everything, including the right to a fair trial.
Judge Perry advised his grave concerns. If he advised these media outlets the location of jury selection in advance, the explosion of media coverage in that location would taint that jury pool in unmeasurable ways. The goal is to get the pool of jurors in the jury room and begin questioning them before the media can infect them with news about the case.
In addition, Judge Perry argued that three news outlets have signed the confidentiality agreement – WFTV, In Session, and WBDO. As Perry advised, these three groups will report freely, thereby allowing the press and the people access to information from the media. But only AFTER the potential jurors have entered the jury room.
The Judge also advised Ms. Mercier that her clients may obtain the information they want independently, as they are wont to do in other situations every day.
Ms. Mercier accused the court of trying to hide from the media, and the public. (The arrogance of this attorney was surprising.)
Judge Perry peppered her with questions about other high-profile court cases which she did not recognize: What other cases have had webpages dedicated to a case, he asked. In what other case have television stations hired one or two legal analysts to cover a case? To both questions, Ms. Mercier had no answer.
Judge Perry went on to say, with some anger, what the media outlets really want is a feeding frenzy for ratings. The result of the press in the location would provide a serious and imminent threat to Casey Anthony’s right to a fair trial. Trying to balance that would be ludicrous.
If Casey Anthony is not promised a fair trial, justice for Caylee is likewise threatened.
Judge Perry spoke eloquently and passionately with regards to defendants rights.
Judge Perry advised that in denying this motion, and if it is appealed, it would result in a delay in the start of the trial. Additionally, it would create an opportunity for the defense to ask for a continuance. The defense has already succeeded in delaying this case, and would surely take every opportunity for a continuance. A delay in the trial would provide the defense a tremendous advantage as people’s memory will fade as the years pile up.
If this media motion were to go to the District Court of Appeals – and it probably will, my favorite attorney, Bill Sheaffer, observed that the Judge’s decision will be upheld.
The Sixth Amendment Promise
Our rights under the Constitution of the United States of America, afford us rights in criminal cases (Amendment V) and rights to a fair trial (Amendment VI).
Casey Anthony MUST have a fair trial, though it appears that her Sixth Amendment Right (to a fair trial) could be severely compromised, if certain media outlets have their way.
It is terribly important that Casey Anthony have a fair trial, especially since she is facing the ultimate penalty, death.
If this case is delayed, Judge Perry advised that a gag order would go into effect, and he would do his utmost to stop the release of documents to the public.
There would be a “cooling off” period with the gag order that could potentially last 6 months to a year, unfortunately delaying justice for the victim, Caylee Anthony. On the other hand, a gag order would would prevent Jose Baez from using the media to float theories about other suspects, other evidence, and different time frames to indicate that his client is, in his words, “innocent.” There is no denying that Jose Baez is not doing Casey Anthony any favors by his proclivity to grand-stand in front of the media about his case.
Whatever happens – a continuance, or if the case moves forward, I am all the more convinced that Judge Perry will ensure Casey Anthony, who probably rarely treated anyone fairly, can be assured she will receive a fair trial.
The U.S. Constitution is in good hands with Judge Belvin Perry – just as it was with Judge Stan Strickland – and we will be witness of a system at its best.
Today’s hearing began with a wimper as attorney Dorothy Clay Simms argued against the State’s botanist, Dr. David Hall. Dr. Hall will provide testimony about the root growth that was both through and around the remains of Caylee Anthony, at the grave site.
Regarding the duct tape with the residue of the heart sticker – we expected this motion would be argued at today’s hearing, but it was not. We learned today that this issue will be decided by the Judge through the pleadings (motions).
The argument by Linda Drane-Burdick on the issue of the Cadaver dogs, was effective. Mr. Baez’ arguments were on the weak side with regards to this motion. Mr. Baez simply could not overcome the arguments made by Ms. Burdick.
Ms. Burdick described the careful training of these dogs, the impeccable records kept, and the professionalism of both dog handlers. She even quipped, “Lawyers aren’t evaluated as often.”
With regards to the stain in the trunk. The argument today was a weak one by the defense. Mr. Baez suggested that the stain in the form of a young child in fetal position created “hysteria” in the public. Hysteria? I don’t think so. Sadness is more like it. Disgust and aversion for Casey would fit that bill, but not hysteria.
The most important point was made as a result of Mr. Baez stating, rather vociferously, “there was no DNA found in the stain.” Well, butter my biscuit, Mr. Ashton may have exclaimed under his breath! That’s pretty disingenuous of Mr. Baez! Mr. Ashton, however was calm, cool and collected when he said to the court, during a decomposition event, the DNA decomposes, too!
The defense was all drama all the time today. There was a bit of comedy, too. When Mr. Baez made cynical remark at the podium, Judge Perry, in a stern tone, advised Mr. Baez to cut out the editorial remarks, and added, ‘You want to make unrelated comments, see the clerk and pay $100!’ Judge Perry, early on in the hearing, was in NO MOOD for any foolishness. The players were much better behaved. They needed to be – Judge Perry would not stand for any foolishness!
The Frye hearings are over now; only Judge Perry’s ruling remains. With regards to these few days of hearings, the defense did not provide evidence strong enough for the Judge to exclude State evidence or witnesses. Mr. Ashton reminded the court that the arbiters of the truth will be the jury as they weigh the testimony of the dueling experts.
Though I cannot say for certain, but it seems to me that Judge Perry will be liberal in allowing all the evidence, despite how new some of it is. I tend to believe that Dr. Vass, the FBI analyst – Karen Lowe, Dr. Hall, the Cadaver dog evidence, and the stain in the car will all come in. In addition, my favorite attorney of all time, Bill Sheaffer, concludes everything will come into the trial, too.
The State has not finished deposing the two defense Psychiatrists and will have motions to present to the court in short order. These new witnesses will be addressed by the parties at the next hearing, scheduled for next Friday, April 15th, at 1:30.
On a separate note…. Voting continues until Sunday for Yuri Melich! Don’t forget to VOTE!
There was just one short moment today when I could tune in to today’s Frye Hearing in the State v. Casey Anthony. I know that a few very interesting experts testified today. Among those testifying today was Dr. Barry Logan, Dr. David Hall, and Dr. Jane Bock.
I was able to sneak a listen into today’s hearing for less than five minutes, and what did I hear? A discussion from Mr. Baez about Pink Elephants in the room. According to Mr. Baez, a Pink Elephant was in the room, but was being ignored by everyone. After making that statement to the court, Judge Belvin Perry had the most beautiful retort! He said, “I don’t see Pink Elephants, Mr. Baez.” That was all that I heard, and I thought – Wow! This must be a very, very interesting hearing!
That was really all I was able to see, unfortunately. But, I did hear about the defense wanting to claim the chloroform could have come from a swimsuit of Caylee’s left in the trunk of the car. That’s a bit of a stretch, to put it mildly.
My favorite attorney analyst, Bill Sheaffer, made one very telling remark. He said, in essence, the defense argued today with a sledge hammer, and the State used a scalpel. In addition, he concluded that the State should prevail in their effort to allow the results of Dr. Arpad Vass, from the Oak Ridge Laboratories. If this should occur, it will be a tremendous advantage for the State as it scientifically confirms the smell of decomposition, that so many will testify to. The science will seal it. Bill Sheaffer said:
The prosecutor will show there’s no debate in the scientific community that Dr. Vass’s methodology and findings are not generally accepted.
In addition, he concluded that other evidence will prove there was a decompositional event in the trunk – cadaver dogs indicated it was there, Casey Anthony’s family, and others, also confirmed the horrible scent.
I would like to extend a very special thanks to CptKD, a reader of the blog, who so graciously reported through out the day on the happenings in the courtroom.
CptKD also advised that Judge Perry should have his rulings rendered by April 21st, if not before.
There are more hearings on Friday, beginning at 9:00.
Have a lovely night, all.
I literally gasped when I saw the WESH headline that Baez was under investigation by the Florida Bar.
I wasn’t surprised, I had just not expected it since none of the media outlets were covering what I thought was a huge, bombshell of a story!
With last Friday’s document release of discovery, there was a great deal of material about the Laura Buchanan issue in which Jose Baez, desperate for some exculpatory evidence to create doubt for Casey, allegedly (according to Brad Conway), lied in open court to Judge Perry. (The information is in a transcript of an interview with Brad Conway and the Orange County Sherriff’s Office (OCSO), and it is shocking.)
Two days ago, I published a story about this very issue. Read: Big trouble for Baez?
According to WESH, Karen Kirksey, a Florida Bar spokesperson, confirmed there is an open file on Baez, but it is confidential until such time as probable cause has been found.
Veteran trial attorney, Bill Sheaffer, legal guru for WFTV, in an interview with Kathi Bellich, says there is no more serious charge that a lawyer can face. If it is indeed true, and if Brad Conway is to be believed, this is reprehensible. Sheaffer said this is a very serious allegation – just as serious as a lawyer stealing from a client.
Sheaffer does say that this will NOT impact the trial, BUT it will seriously impact Baez’s credibility with Judge Perry.
Let’s recap what happened:
It began when Todd Macaloso stood in open court and said that Casey Anthony was innocent, and they can prove it. Macaloso was referring to the alleged statements of Joe Jordan (who later realized he was wrong and had not searched where Caylee’s body was found, he was a about 30 feet off).
The defense was aware of Joe Jordan and his initial claims and they jumped all over it. Then, not too long after Joe Jordan, along came Laura Buchanan who claims she searched where Casey’s body was later found, but said the area was DRY and Caylee was not there. (She later recanted and now admits to falsifying the TES document.)
While Laura was a legitimate TES searcher, her actions were wholly illegitimate. She is now being investigated by the OCSO for tampering with evidence.
Before all this was known about Buchanan, however, she simply wanted to insert herself in the case. She falsified a TES search document saying that she’d been in the location where the body was found. In addition, she falsified Joe Jordan’s name on her bogus TES form, then attempted to coax him into calling Baez. Joe Jordan never did.
Then, in August 2010, Baez wrote a motion in which he claimed that both Laura Buchanan and Joe Jordan will come into court and say, effectively, that Casey could not have put Caylee’s body where it was found, because there is proof Caylee was not there in September of 2008. Casey could not have put Caylee there, claimed the Defense – Casey was in jail.
As I laid out in Monday’s post, Jose Baez had long been requesting of Brad Conway to contact Laura Buchanan as she had some important evidence that is HUGE for Casey Anthony. Baez asked Conway at least three times, over a period of a year, to contact Buchanan, Conway never did. As such, Conway was not aware of what Laura Buchanan would say.
Brad Conway told OCSO that he did not want to help Baez because he was furious with him for going behind his back and working with the Anthony’s to reverse a previous waiver of conflict with Tim Miller that allowed Mark NeJame to represent him. Baez worked with the Anthony’s to try and reverse the waiver of conflict. Such a thing is not done and it infuriated Conway. Furthermore, Conway told OCSO, that if the information from Laura Buchanan was so critical and exculpatory, Baez should be handling it himself! It was not Conway’s job to work for Casey’s Defense.
However, Conway DID agree to go to Mark NeJame’s office and look through the TES documents to try to find if there were any documents with Buchanan’s name on them – Conway found none. In addition, Baez asked him again to search for a half dozen other names in the documents, one of the names was Roy Kronk. Brad did comb through the documents looking for Roy Kronk’s name. He found none.
To make this long story short, the reason why Baez is in serious trouble is because, in August 2010, to bolster his claim about Laura Buchanan and Joe Jordan being critical witnesses, Baez lied and said that Brad Conway ALSO knows that Caylee’s body could not have been at the location in September 2008, because he has two witnesses (and now Conway) who will support this.
Brad Conway vehemently denies ever stating such a thing to Baez.
Brad Conway, as far as I am concerned, is believable. And, as we have known for some time, Baez makes his own rules and seems to be cut from the same cloth as the Anthony’s.
Oh yes, this is indeed a BOMBSHELL!
Monday’s status hearing in the case against Casey Anthony, though brief, was chock full of interesting bits of insight.
There are two Orlando attorney’s who regularly comment on this case and who always share valuable insight. They are Richard Hornsby, and Bill Sheaffer. And yesterday Attorney Sheaffer gave an excellent explanation about “excited utterances.” Specifically he discusses what it means according to the law, and also, more importantly, what it means in this case.
To review the excellent interview of Bill Sheaffer by reporter Kathi Bellich – please click here.
There is an important motion hearing coming up July 15th. At that hearing the admissibility of the 911 calls will be argued by both sides. Also argued, the EquuSearch files, as well as whether Roy Kronk will be put under the microscope with regards his supposed “prior bad acts” and the feasibility that he could be a suspect in the case.
However, according to WFTV, and other sources, the Defense may be backing off of the Kronk angle. Attorney Bill Sheaffer feels it’s a weak argument – most of us with knowledge of the case do as well.
Check out the coverage on WFTV by clicking here.
George Anthony to Casey: Here’s a map – put an X where we can find Caylee!
It is a bad day for the defense. A bombshell of a bad day. Today’s evidence spells E-N-D G-A-M-E.
There is so much to report, so much to say, I want to keep this simple right now and share this with you, words from Attorney Bill Sheaffer:
All this evidence is like holes in the dam and after a while even Cheney Mason runs out of fingers.
Oh, that surely says it all.
Here is a link to Sheaffer’s video clip with Kathi Belich.
It is very difficult to watch the Anthony family media clips. It is infuriating to see their blase’ air – how they seem to be totally out of touch – as though the focus should be on thier suffering! Frankly, if we saw them suffer the loss of Caylee, surely everyone and anyone would continue to feel for them, feel the pain of thier horrific loss.
Today, after having seen George Anthony being interviewed (prior to his scheduled deposition) by Orlando’s local media, and seeing his oddly apologetic air, I am reminded once again of the stench in Denmark, the rotten air, the putrid state of affairs, and the glib disregard for truth that has become the defense in this case. In front of the State Attorney’s office today, decked in golfing duds (plaid shorts, pastel shirt, looking tan), George Anthony spoke volumes in regards to what and who he stands for, and it’s not Caylee. Clearly we see it is no longer about Caylee, which makes it impossible to sympathize with him, or Cindy, or Lee.
According to my favorite Orlando attorney, and WFTV Legal Analyst Bill Sheaffer, this week’s depositions were a strategic prosecutorial move to secure critical testimony in advance of the trial – lock it in, so to speak – to ensure that, come their time to testify during the case in chief, if the Anthony’s attempt to change or alter their testimony in deference to sympathy for Casey, their credibility will be all but shattered. And more importantly, it will only add to the destruction of Casey’s credibility.
If, during the criminal trial, the Anthony’s dare to deviate from what they’ve said this week in depositions, or should they try to change their story to help Casey, the state can request that the Judge declare the witness “hostile” (to the state). And this will simply turn the tables, forcing their direct testimony, allowing the state to “lead” the witness to get to at the truth. ( Truth? Now, there’s a concept.)
Sheaffer tells us that, should any of the Anthony’s attempt to change their testimony, or should they attempt coy or manipulative responses on the stand, the judge can declare them “hostile to the state’s conviction” (Sheaffer, 11/05/09, WFTV). Therefore, taking these depositions, according to Sheaffer, was a very smart and strategic move on behalf of the State Attorney’s Office, as the state will be better equipped to handle the wayfaring testimony of this rambling fan-damily, should they be declared hostile.
Furthermore, when the Anthony’s do take the stand, they will have to account for all the mistruths, all the deception, and all the “opinions” they’ve spouted since day one.
It goes without saying that the Anthony’s would have been well served, during this week of depositions, to come clean with the truth as they know it. However, only time will tell if they were forthcoming as this week’s depo testimony will likely be held until trial (unless either side orders a copy of the transcript), and not become public record.
If and when, during the criminal trial, an Anthony family member is declared hostile, he or she will not be allowed to go on-and-on-and-on as they did in the civil depositions. This means, we won’t see the gum chewing, or the cursing; there will be no tearing off and throwing of a microphone, no refusing to answer, no incessant or inappropriate giggling. Nope. Not in a criminal courtroom, thank you very much.